The process of community diagnosis involves four stages: Data collection and analysis 3. Initiation In order to initiate a community diagnosis project, a dedicated committee or working group should be set up to manage and coordinate the project.
Next Page content If an organization is considering whether to collect data on its own or get help from an external consultant, it will need to have enough information to make an informed decision about how to proceed.
This section outlines some of the key considerations that may arise during various steps in the data collection process. There is no requirement that these steps be followed or pursued in the order that they are written. The model presented is offered as a reference tool.
How data is gathered and analyzed depends on many factors, including the context, the issue that needs to be monitored, the purpose of the data collection, and the nature and size of the organization. The main consideration is to make sure that any information collected is done in a way and for a purpose that is consistent with the Code and complies with freedom of information and privacy protection legislation.
In the interest of effectiveness and efficiency, it is recommended that efforts be made to collect data that will shed light on issues or opportunities.
To protect the credibility and reliability of data, information should be gathered using accepted data collection techniques. To do this, it may be helpful to conduct an internal and external assessment to understand what is happening inside and outside of your organization.
Other organizations may have more flexibility to decide when and how to collect information to achieve certain goals. Some of the non-exhaustive questions identified below may apply to a diverse range of organizations and audiences, including employees and service users.
Depending on the organization, these questions may be considered at Step 1, or at different stages in a data collection process. Conduct a review of all policies, practices and procedures applicable to employees, service users or another appropriate audience: Does the organization have human resources and human rights policies, practices and procedures that are accessible to all employees or to the people they serve?
Does the organization have clear, transparent and fair complaint procedures in place to deal with allegations of discrimination, harassment or systemic barriers? Have any claims, grievances or allegations been made or received relating to discrimination, harassment or systemic barriers?
Have any been dealt with appropriately and in accordance with existing polices, practices and procedures? Explore organizational culture from a human rights, diversity and equity-inclusion lens: What are the organization's mandate, goals and core values? What is the history of the organization?
Are equity, diversity and inclusiveness supported, reflected and promoted by senior leaders throughout the organization? Do employees feel that the organization is diverse, inclusive, and provides equal opportunity for learning and advancement?
How are decisions made? How are employment, programming or service delivery opportunities advertised? Does the organization have formal, transparent and fair processes in place to recruit, hire, promote, terminate and retire staff?
Does the organization have a clear system of discipline? Is this system perceived to be applied fairly and consistently? Do service users feel that they are welcome, valued, and able to use the services offered by the organization?
Is there evidence from other organizations or jurisdictions that a policy, program or practice, similar to one in place at the organization, has had a positive or negative impact on Code-protected persons or other marginalized persons in society?
How is the organization perceived by the community it operates in? Have the media or advocacy groups complimented or criticized the organization about human rights, human resource or equity issues?
What are the demographics of the people the organization serves or the community it operates in? Are the demographics changing or projected to change in the future? Is the organization proactively looking at ways to make sure that it has the skills and knowledge to meet the potential needs and concerns of this changing demographic?
Is the organization representative of and responsive to the needs of the community it serves? At this stage, a detailed comparison is not needed. Are there any areas in the organization or in service delivery where the persons or groups seem to be obviously over-represented or under-represented?
Finding the above information can be challenging for smaller organizations, but the internet offers a wealth of resources to choose from. Media reports may offer insights, as well as on-line resources offered by the OHRC, Statistics Canada,  the City of Toronto,  government agencies, and community organizations that focus on Code and non-Code ground-related topics.
Information may also be gathered from various sources using accepted data collection research methodologies discussed in Step 3.This section is quite dense for people who have little or no background with data analysis, but we will take you through it step by step.
There's no need to try to grasp it quickly. * Explain the V’s of Big Data (volume, velocity, variety, veracity, valence, and value) and why each impacts data collection, monitoring, storage, analysis and reporting.
* Get value out of Big Data by using a 5-step process to structure your analysis. Whether quantitative and/or qualitative methods of gathering data are used, the analysis can be complex, or less so, depending on the methods used and the amount of data collected.
Explaining the technical steps involved in analyzing and interpreting data is beyond the scope of this guide. Data analysis process Data collection and preparation Collect data Prepare codebook Set up structure of data Enter data Screen data for errors Exploration of data Three steps of factor analysis 1.
Data cleaning: The first step in data analysis is to improve data quality. Data scientists correct spelling mistakes, handle missing data and weed out nonsense information. Data scientists correct spelling mistakes, handle missing data and weed out nonsense information. Steps of the research process This is an excerpt from Applied Research and Evaluation Methods in Recreation By Diane C. Blankenship. Scientific research involves a systematic process that focuses on being objective and gathering a multitude of information . This factsheet examines the steps involved in carrying out a useful community needs analysis. These steps include the following: 1. Define the scope of your analysis 2. Collect the information and data 3. Determine the findings 4. Set goals and determine an action plan.
Assessment of the suitability of the data for factor analysis 2. Factor extraction 3. In problem solving, there are four basic steps. 1. Define the problem. All the individuals involved will accept the alternative. ASQ celebrates the unique perspectives of our community of members, staff and those served by our society.
Collectively, we are the voice of quality, and we increase the use and impact of quality in response. What are the four steps involved in data analysis? As a consequence what are possible errors that can easily be made when developing community diagnoses from survey data?
We all know change does not just happen even when the idea on the table is excellent.