Candidates will be required to produce a folder comprising two pieces of original writing, differentiated by primary audience, purpose and genre, and two commentaries which explore the writing process and assess the success of the individual pieces. Their genre choices will be ambitious and challenging; range and variety will be evident throughout their folder
Telling porkies about gammon If you're thinking ahead to Paper 2 at the end of the week and wondering about potential case studies to use for the language change question or even for debates about language for Section B, gammon might be a good place to look.
It's one of those words that's been around for a while with one main meaning a kind of smoked ham but it's recently developed a newer and more controversial meaning that's been used online and debated in various newspapers by some of the most high profile columnists and sharpest minds of our generation and Brendan O'Neill from the appalling Spiked Online.
It's a neat example of semantic change, polysemy and debates about the potential of language to cause offence. It also ties in quite nicely with the sample paper on 'literally' and attitudes to language change.
So what does this new type of 'gammon' mean? But it was in that it really took off when it was used to describe a post-Brexit vote phenomenon that many had observed but few had been able to nail so accurately: You might have seen the "wall of gammon" assembled from the faces of Question Time audience members judged to fit the criteria.
So far so good. On the other hand, if that's you, your dad or your Uncle Barry, it might not go down so well. And doesn't that mean that 'gammon' therefore must be a racial slur? That was certainly the argument put forward by the DUP MP Emma Little-Pengelly who claimed that 'gammon' was a term 'based on skin colour and age' and therefore a slur that should not be used.
You can read more about it here and about the subsequent debate over the term. Use of the term has spiked in the last few weeks. And while the original meaning of gammon seems to have been on the decline since its peak in around as the Google n-gram below shows, its more recent meaning has spread far and wide.
The number of searches for 'gammon' as an insult or 'gammon' as slang can be tracked through Google Trends and they show a spike in Probably, if these charts are anything to go by.
And that's an interesting case study in itself, because tracing the spread of a new slang term, or an old word that's been given a new meaning, is a fascinating way of looking at what language is and how it works.
But what about the wider debate about gammon as an insult? Is it - as several have claimed - a racist slur? Is it sharp intake of breath as bad as the n-word? This tweeter thinks not and I'd tend to agree with him. But that's Twitter and people are often very rude on Twitter. I try to stay off it these days and fail most of the time.
What about other commentators? And what about the wider language debate about what constitutes a slur? One accusation is that gammon has been used by left-wingers to attack their political opponents when reasoned argument fails.
It sits alongside centrist dad and melt as terms that left-wingers use to abuse those to their right and perhaps equates with the kind of jibes that right-wingers have been chucking at the left for even longer: Matt Zarb-Cousin is one such left-winger and he argues in Huck magazine that it can't be racist as it's directed at a group of people who choose to behave in a certain way.
On the other hand, Lucy Fisher in The Times argues a different line: Whether or not the trope is a statement about race, it is obviously a statement about culture and class. Gammons are backward, provincial embarrassments.
They may be unskilled workers or small business owners or wealthy aristocrats.
No debate about politics would be complete without Owen Jones of The Guardian getting a word in. Gammon is a racist slur, we are told. Let me put this gently: White people mocking other white people over their skin colour is not racism.The commentary is just as important as the Original Writing piece in that it is also words and the same aqa of marks Coursework piece will test english ability language employ all of the assessment objectives equally.
As Level English Language Coursework Aqa Dec 19, Block language and argument a level aqa coursework A Desired English Coursework Help A Full English language a level coursework help The TOEFL GCSE Coursework Don't, Maths, Phenomenon.
Course Companions, Revision Guides, Exam Practice for Secondary Schools from ZigZag Education The Writer's Process: How to Write a Reflective Commentary for A Level AQA Our site uses grupobittia.com: £ Right, due tomorrow.
I've been trying to start it for a couple of hours now and have no idea how to! Here's my production: Neil Patrick Harris – a nam. Welcome to ZigZag English! Here you can browse, preview and order photocopiable teaching resources for English Literature, English Language, Lang & Lit and Creative Writing.
Original Writing and Reflective Commentary NEA Teaching Pack for A Level AQA English Language Pick up and teach this lesson scheme of work with clearly structured lesson plans and inspiring tasks for the NEA component of the A Level AQA grupobittia.com: £